TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:05:45 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ah, Jim,

I wish that were so. Shocking, but true. After all yesterday I ran into a
ham and was showing him my HF mobile set-up. He remarked, "why do you need
an antenna when you can operate full duplex anywhere in the world with your
cell phone?"

Study? Who needs to study? Just use your cell phone! Gee .. I really wonder!

73 de Phil - N8PS

-----

Quoting Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>:

On 11/1/2013 9:11 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
If someone jumps straight into RFI ham, I'm sure he'll get a shock, unless he is pretty tech savvy.

Gee, I'm sorry to hear that. I tried very hard to write it for someone who understood the basics of electronics, electrical circuits, transmission lines, and antennas. Is that assumption unreasonable? And I've tried to write in a form that "tells the story," leading logically from point A to point B to point C.

There's also an important difference between casually reading something as opposed to really studying it. It took me years to figure this stuff out, and I understood these fundamentals quite well. Someone seeing these concepts for the first time should expect to STUDY it, not just read it casually.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>