| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] (ham station computer choice) |
| From: | Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-to: | Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 May 2014 20:40:43 -0500 (GMT-05:00) |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jim, (the moderator of this forum?), Is this really to be allowed, a post by an unsigned person BLASTING about another member? Certainly we all pick and poke with differences at times as to being subjective/objective on topics. But this post below goes way past that and falls into nothing but a not so hidden attack? If that person has a bone with James, then take it off the forum and work it out between the two. Nor can I recall any posts of substance from the person who failed to sign his personal attack. Rick tends to push the envelope too at times, again as many of us do. So be it. We pause and live long. Billy, AA4NU -----Original Message----- From: paulpolace <wn8qhf@wowway.com> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Panadapters, Wade Staggs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ADMIN: Not-so-gentle reminder about the rules of the list, Jim Lowman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] (ham station computer choice), Tony |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] (ham station computer choice), Mike Schatzberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |