TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Merger

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Merger
From: wo8l--- via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Reply-to: wo8l@aol.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:47:26 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Amen, bro.  It's very taxing to me.
 
Rick
WO8L
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 7:36 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Merger


I think all tax is unfair.  

73
Bob K4TAX


Sent from my iPhone

> On May 12, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net> wrote:
> 
> And maybe you can explain that further.....
> 
> Cecil
> K5DL
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On May 12, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Don Rasmussen via TenTec 
>> <tentec@contesting.com> 
wrote:
>> 
>> First thing RFC/TT should do is move service to some place where it is not 
unfairly taxed. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>