TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] More Junk....

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] More Junk....
From: Neil Martinsen-Burrell <neilmartinsenburrell@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:19:18 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
That is no prototype, that is an image created on a computer imagining what
a prototype could look like.  If you have any doubt, look at the patterning
on the front panel knobs at the top right.  They are obviously a cut and
paste job.  The lack of detail on the feet is also a giveaway.

The only poor quality we could worry about at this point is that of their
graphic artist.

-Neil KD0UKC


On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Tom Pennebaker <n4rs@iamotelephone.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If you will look closely at the rear picture, you can detect poor
> quality.
> >
>
> It's only a prototype and maybe we can cut them some slack for that.
>
> Hey, 15 years ago folks were saying the same thing about Bulgarian linear
> amplifiers and they turned out pretty good.
>
> Whether or not this ever ends up being a viable product, I'm happy to see
> some engineers pushing DDC/DUC SDR development for hams in new directions.
>
> Barry N1EU
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>