That makes sense because adjusting the sidetone during the test did not
change anything, as I think about it.
I'll have a go at your further suggestions tomorrow.
It is good to have the VI+ to compare to, which is known to be working
"right."
I notice that the alignment info in the manuals shows that on the VI, CW
tune is C16, LSB receive is C10 and USB receive is C12. In the VI+, CW
tune is C10, LSB receive is C16 and USB receive is C12. I guess that is to
keep everyone hopping.
Many thanks again.
73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> By "listening in" directly to the BFO signals at 9MHz you are independent
> of all the sidetone and XIT offset processing that goes on in the
> microprocessor. The BFO oscillator is completely free-running and not under
> any control from the microprocessor.
>
> So your measurements were still valid no matter what those settings.
>
> Steve G3TXQ
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 30/07/2014 22:08, Jim Allen wrote:
>
>> It occurred to me while restoring the gear to operational use that I
>> neglected to set the sidetone in the Omni VI+ back to 700 Hz before I did
>> the test with it. I had lowered the frequency of the sidetone on the VI+
>> to 400 Hz while testing the Omni VI. Those readings I reported for the
>> Omni VI+ are likely off by 300 Hz. I beg your pardon.
>>
>> 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|