TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] History repeats itself . . .

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] History repeats itself . . .
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:09:23 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Agree with Rick and Ron.  I'm concerned whether the smaller radio
manufacturers can muster the programming resources for an SDR offering.
We're talking man years of development effort.  That's one reason Flex went
proprietary with the new 6K series.

73, Barry N1EU

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Well, I have a dusty SUV Rick, but you're going to have to come over here
> to wash it!
>
> Yes, history does repeat itself.  The difference between then and now is
> that when I work you, whatever the mode, I don't know what you're running
> and you don't know what I'm running (unless we say so, of course).  It's
> not like an older analog/digital rig can't work an SDR and vice versa.
>
> But, just as full tube rigs gave way to hybrids which gave way to full
> solid state, it's pretty obvious that the manufacturing process for radios
> is heading down one of two inter-woven forks:  SDR and SMT.  There will
> always be something of a market for "old fashioned" transistor or IC rigs,
> just as there's something of a market today for boat anchors and tube
> rigs.  I just wouldn't expect to see ANY major manufacturer be able to
> profitably mass market such a rig to the world amateur community today.
> ("Mass market" being a relative term, of course0
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> On 11/03/14, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
>
> When I began ham radio in (SWL in 1959, ticket in 62), SSB was just on its
> way in.
> The phone bands were still 99.xx % AM.
>
> In my QTH, there were only 2 or 3 OM on SSB.
> We three high school kids decided to go that route and in 1963 I got my
> Galaxy 300 SSB transceiver.
> It cost $300 which was a lot of money for a school boy.
> Mowed a lot of lawns and washed a lot of cars to pay for it.
>
> Once on SSB, we found many of the locals, our "friends", refused to talk to
> us.
>
> For the next several years, the bands slowly shifted from AM to SSB.
> However in 1970, there were still small groups of OM working AM and
> swearing
> they would stay on AM until they died.
> In many cases, their wish came true.
>
> (Note: this is not to be compared with those today who work AM for the fun
> of it. These guys never went on SSB and never spoke to SSB stations.)
>
> We kids shook our heads at them and I promised myself I would never get
> like
> that.
>
> Today's ham world is rapidly migrating to SDR.
> Many OM are saying they will never go that route.
> But ham radio will go that way, with or without them.
>
> HISTORY DOES REPEAT ITSELF.
>
> Reluctantly I am going to force myself to move on.
> Most likely I will adapt.
>
> If I fail to adapt, it may be because I am too old and set in my ways,
> but it won't be because I was too stubborn to try it!
>
> Anyone have a dirty car I can wash? ;-)
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>