TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers
From: Art Roberts - W5AER <w5aer@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 04:55:08 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

Steve,

Back then, I started with a Twoer too, but added the converter/receiver and just transmitted with the Twoer. The Twoer's had very good audio punch, for a low power rig. I was at Westover AFB, Mass at the time and needed some selectivity. Also added a Cushcraft 16 element collinear on the roof of the barracks. Fun days...

Art
____

Art Roberts - W5AER
Tariffville, CT




------ Original Message ------
From: "Steve Berg" <wa9jml@frontier.com>
To: tentec@contesting.com
Sent: 11/5/2014 8:54:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers

When I worked 2 Meter AM in the 1960s, I normally used a Heath Twoer. No need for a panadapter with one of those!

73,

Steve WA9JML


On 11/5/2014 4:12 PM, Art Roberts - W5AER wrote:

You are right, no one needs a panadapter, but it can be handy..

My only use of one was in the mid 60's, on 2 meter AM. I had a Heathkit panadaptor attached to my converter-receiver setup. In those days we were usually rock bound for transmit and after calling CQ you had to tune around for a reply. The panadaptor made all of this much easier.

____

Art Roberts - W5AER
Tariffville, CT



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>