TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Reflector Buy-Back program

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Buy-Back program
From: Joe Papworth via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:18:57 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
So you started this seemingly endless discussion on a radio that might never 
exist?

Later, Joe, K8MP


-----Original Message-----
From: rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment' <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, Aug 17, 2016 2:29 am
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Buy-Back program

Gary, Direct Sampling technology is not just for receivers. The transmitters I 
have seen so far have all been significantly cleaner, at least as far as 
broadband noise goes, than most of our recent transceivers out of Japan. I 
don't know about their keying spectrum. Good dynamic range with direct sampling 
radios is not a future, it is here today. However we need to understand that. 
When we say "good dynamic range", it is because Rob Sherwood has moved our 
focus to the 3rd order dynamic range of our receivers, which was the single 
most important indicator of a radio's ability to copy a weak signal in the 
presence of one or more near-by strong signals. At least it was in the old 
heterodyning radios. But that has changed now. With direct sampling, DR3 is not 
an indication of the ultimate performance of the radio. There are other 
factors, like efficiency of implementing firmware code. The 7300 is in position 
12 (I believe) on Rob's list. This means it is 12th best in DR3. As far as 
being able to copy weak signals in the presence of strong, it would be much 
further down the list. So DR3 is no longer an indicator of a radio's 
performance. I know of at least two cases where Multi-Multi stations have 
compared direct sampling radios to K3 and found them significantly better in 
not crunching from the local RF in the air from their other 5 transmitters. One 
case was the K3, not the S. I don't recall which version the other compared to. 
I jokingly say, Direct Sampling has made yesterday's tomorrow today. It's not 
fair to accuse Flex of bringing out new radios every 6 months. They do not do 
that. Flex has had two families of SDR radios. The first ones (1500/3000/5000) 
were not direct sampling and required computers to do a lot of the labor 
(number crunching). The second family (6300/6500/6700) are direct sampling and 
the computer is primarily only used for display and control, not for number 
crunching. The expectation level was that the first generation would make old 
heterodyning technology obsolete. That did not happen and never will. The 
current direct sampling radios have made old heterodyning technology obsolete. 
Unless some OEM has a brand new heterodyning radio just about to announce, I 
doubt if we see any more. The market is in the middle of a full transition to 
direct sampling radios. Prices will come down soon. Those of you complaining 
about this thread not pertaining to Ten-Tec are hopelessly lost. It has 
EVERYTHING to do with Ten-Tec's potential to survive. We are discussing exactly 
the technology which Ten-Tec should be working on. IMO, if they bring out old 
heterodyning radios again at this late stage in the game, rather than direct 
sampling radios, they won't last another year in the ham radio business. Well 
perhaps their service department will, servicing old radios. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP 
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) -----Original Message----- From: TenTec 
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary J FollettDukes HiFi 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:34 AM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment 
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Buy-Back program Dwelling on a mediocre product 
like the 7300 is probably not the objective of this forum. However, learning as 
much as possible about direct digital receivers is relevant because that is the 
way things are going to go, for KenSuCom and for Ten Tec (as well as Elecraft). 
I look back at the old mechanical switch television tuners, many of which I 
have repaired or replaced, and laugh because the television companies charged 
EXTRA for the Varactor diode tuned sets when they began to replace the 
mechanical tuners. In reality, the manufacturing costs for Varactor tuned 
tuners were a fraction of the costs for the switch type tuners. For a while, 
the television makers had the best of both worlds, lower manufacturing costs 
cost and higher prices. It doesn’t get any better than that from a business 
perspective. This will happen with digital direct conversion radios as well, 
once the improvements in real dynamic range are made and the selling prices 
fall into line with manufacturing costs. Imagine the driving force for 
manufacturers: 1) No expensive crystal filters 2) No bandswitches 3) Virtual 
knobs that can do any function you desire (for those who, like myself, insist 
on a radio with real knobs) 4) Ability to improve function with a simple 
downloadable firmware upgrade - something Ten Tec pioneered 5) Every feature 
you can imagine, including a band scope that puts Orion (and most other radios) 
to shame 6) A natural course for obsolescence, driving new sales. Obsolete one 
crucial part in the radio and panic drives people to liquidate the old and buy 
new The Flex business model of introducing a new model every time the seasons 
change drives prices of previous models low enough that we bargain hunters can 
buy pretty awesome performance for pennies on the dollar. As a result, the only 
thing that depreciates in value faster than an SDR is an open can of Coors 
Lite. That’s great for us bargain hunters… Gary W0DVN > On Aug 16, 2016, at 
10:50 PM, Joe Papworth via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com> wrote: > > Can we buy 
this forum back from the 7300? > I'll chip in $5.00 for starters... > > Later, 
> Joe, K8MP > > Sent from AOL Mobile Mail > 
_______________________________________________ > TenTec mailing list > 
TenTec@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list 
TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list 
TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>