590SG has a legacy user interface. Good things going on inside of box but user
interface does not present a spectrum view, on screen decode functions, etc. I
believe the market will demand interfaces similar to that of the ICOM rigs.
The Yaesu rigs like the FTDX 1200 also has on screen decode and spectrum. It's
a way to get something like a flex in a box that doesn't need a computer. The
User interface and feature set is what's driving the ICOM 7300 sales.
N5TF
From: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
To: terry foskey <n5tf@yahoo.com>; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
<tentec@contesting.com>; "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Cc: terry foskey <n5tf@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Scale Of Eagle Production
Why is it folks on this forum set the Icom 7300 as the standard for
excellence? I compared it feature by feature to the Kenwood TS590SG to replace
my Orion II, and selected the Kenwood. It has an excellent receiver, truly
fantastic filtering, transmit audio, etc. and I've never looked back or
regretted my decision. The 7300 is a great rig, but why not give the 590SG
some praise also?
Also, I agree with a lot that was said about the Eagle. I have one and use it
a lot for portable operation due to it's size, weight, receiver performance and
power output. I think it does an outstanding job. I also have an Argonaut VI
with the 100 watt Ten-Tec amp that I use strictly for cw and QRP work without
the amp. I am extremely happy with it.
I don't think anyone would regret purchasing either the Eagle or Argonaut VI,
as long as they fully understand the rigs and their capabilities.
Just my two cents worth.
Scott K4VWK
-----Original Message-----
>From: terry foskey via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
>Sent: Feb 20, 2017 8:38 AM
>To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
>Cc: terry foskey <n5tf@yahoo.com>
>Subject: [TenTec] Scale Of Eagle Production
>
>Eagle numbers at $1600 per unit. Thats a stoudt price point when comparing to
>an Icom 7300.
>How many units to produce meaningful funding for R&D expansion?
>Let's assume $300 or $500 profit per unit (thats after Overhead, Labor and
>Materials), 100 unit run, that's $30 to $50K in profit. Probably optimistic
>numbers.
>
>Let's assume the R&D cost per engineering hour is $100 per hour, you are
>looking at 300 to 500 hours being produced from a 100 unit run. What can be
>engineered from 300 to 500 hours of R&D funding? Certainly not something
>which is far afield from existing products.
>This is my point, is it better to somehow take this down time, take profit
>from other commercial products and use the profit on a quick R&D effort to
>revamp an existing product or use the time to produce a radio with limited
>demand? Then take more time (if the Eagle sells) to make something for next
>year.
>If you want to produce something now, make Alpha Wattmeters, Amplifiers,
>TenTec manual Tuners, accessories, etc....Figure out which products will sell
>with the largest profit margin and go for it.
>
>I applaud Mike's efforts and I will support TenTec but not via an Eagle
>purchase. I don't believe the Eagle has the feature set being sought by
>customers.
>N5TF,Terry
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|