To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Verticals |
From: | "Frank Mayer" <wy3d@usa.com> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:47:27 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Just a question that I have wondered about for years. Why don't medium wave broadcsters use inverted vees or dipoles instead of vertcals? Our experience on the ham bands have been that low dipoles are better for close in operation than vertically polarized low angle radiators. Could it be frequency dependant? Frank WY3D _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160 m, Tree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Verticals, Earl W Cunningham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160 m, Tree |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Verticals, Earl W Cunningham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |