Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
From: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:07:36 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Come on Bill ...  did i say you did ?
>also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.

Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see 
that structure ... 
Id like to know what SDR was so poor.

SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old woman) 
Flying Circus any one?


> From: baycock@mediacombb.net
> To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500
> 
> Mike--
> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is.
> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive. 
> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> Bill--W4BSG
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: MIKE DURKIN
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> 
> If i must ....
> 
> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate signals 
> ...
> 
> That in its self has three problems ...
> 
> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not 
> apples to turds)
> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)?
> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull SDR 
> that he built.
> 
> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by simply 
> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering radio 
> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put into the 
> SDR i guess.
> 
> And i worry about you Bill .... the word "SPAM" being an expletive in your 
> vocabulary ...
> 
> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this -- 
> 
> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it will 
> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed.
> 
> how many samples per second are true overload .... and i mean overload --  
> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really shouldn't put 
> forth an opinion as truth.
> 
> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out the 
> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it out, 
> if not again.
> 
> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: baycock@mediacombb.net
> > To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500
> > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: MIKE DURKIN
> > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM
> > To: topband@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >
> > SPAM !!!!!!
> >
> > Mike--
> > Can you explain this opinion?
> > In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is well
> > thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me.
> > Bill--W4BSG
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
                                          
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>