| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65 | 
| From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com) | 
| Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 1998 10:16:59 EDT | 
| 
In a message dated 98-08-10 01:29:02 EDT, wa7fab@cdsnet.net writes:
>  On one of my
>  communication sites I have two hundred feet of 55 guyed at three
>  levels.  The top of couple of sections carry a six bay FM station
>  antenna and from there on down to the thirty foot level it is totally
>  loaded with antennas for all types of commercial users including another
>  three bay FM station antenna..  Its on a mountain top about sixty air
>  miles east of the Oregon coast,  subjected to strong winds and some
>  icing in the winter with never a problem.  I can't imagine needing
>  anything larger than 55 for any reasonable ham installation.  Provided
>  its guyed properly.  The Rohn tower brochure has all the specs and
>  guying information. 
       Just for the record, the Rohn 55G specs call for four sets of guys @ 70
MPH and five sets for 90 MPH. Some of the coastal counties are in the 80-85
MPH range so that would have been the safe spec to use.
Cheers,  Steve  K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] 25G Rotator Plate., Kurt Andress | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] 25G Rotator Plate., K7LXC@aol.com | 
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Towers & Trees, Barry Kutner | 
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65, John Brosnahan | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |