I>>>>>
TowerTalk is not, in my view, an appropriate vehicle to claw anyone unless
the person doing the clawing does so with an identity disclosure. You
yourself have disclosed your identity as NA1I which is fine. Whoever
Strabdoc is, and I don't know, took what appears to me to be the low road
and attacked, out of the blue, and with protection of an e-mail address
which might have been coined by the CIA.
>>>>>>
Actually, I posted something some time ago regarding tower companies and was
deluged with negative responses regarding one of the companies (you have used
the name not I). I can not tell if these are true but if they are they
should be looked into. Many of the people feel they were dealt with
unfairly, let the legal system decide. Most felt they had no way of
rectifying the problem...they do. If there is no basis to any of these
issues, it will go nowhere. However, problems like these will not stop if
nobody speaks about them.
I agree enough bandwidth has been taken up with this.
Those who want to do something about it now have a mechanism to do so.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|