Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] potentially interesting FCC ruling today

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] potentially interesting FCC ruling today
From: bcrowell@excite.com (Bill Crowell)
Date: Tue Jul 8 16:21:07 2003
The decision was based on the doctrine of federal preemption of state and local 
laws by Article VI (the "Supremacy Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, which 
reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in 
pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the 
authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the 
judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or 
laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

Another interesting application of FCC preemption of radio regulation is that 
only the Commmission has the jurisdiction to regulate alleged radio 
interference, regardless of whether the alleged interference is inadvertent or 
intentional.  Example: in 1975 the WESCARS net, by its attorney Ed Peck, K6AN 
(SK) sued Ralph Ennis, WA6GVG, in state court for an injunction against his 
alleged interference with the WESCARS net. The case was dismissed on demurrer 
(pre-trial proceedings) on the basis that, under federal preemption and the 
supremacy clause, only the Commission can regulate interference in the amateur 
service.  After the case was dismissed, WA6GVG sued WESCARS and its officers 
for malicious prosecution and abuse of process and collected over $20,000 from 
them.  Moral:  NEVER try to take amateur enforcement into your own hands.  
Leave it to the Commission.  Bill Crowell, N6AYJ


_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>