Ha Ha Ha!
Exactly my point.
BTW the answer is YES to all those things. And antenna modeling
and terrain modeling made that all possible! I'm a believer.
73
Bob KQ2M
> In a message dated 9/18/2004 1:22:52 PM Central Standard Time,
> kq2m@earthlink.net writes:
> My yagis worked fine too, until I spent a lot of time computer
> modeling them over my terrain. I found better configurations
> which provided more wave angle coverage and better stacking
> patterns and gain. They worked fine before.
> Fortunately I did not rely on the "they work fine" concept of
> antenna design. I knew they could work better and
> as a result of my modeling and hard work, my yagis work much better now!
>
> Bob:
>
> Your comments are just too vague and subjective. "My yagis work much
better
> now!" Much better than what? Over what paths? Better gain? Better
> bandwidth? Better performance per dollar or just better absolute
performance? Better
> suvivability? C'mon Bob, let us in on the details!
>
> 73,
>
> Jim W9TM
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|