Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Multiple antennas-- offpointed stacks

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Multiple antennas-- offpointed stacks
From: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
Reply-to: jimjarvis@ieee.org
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:28:18 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
W8JI's observations reminded me of some of the doubts
I've had, when taking the lower yagi in a stack, and
pointing it stateside.  (Or, in w3gm's case, putting a 3el
up at 25', fixed west & splitting the power.)
My comment was...it is sometimes effective.

'Sometimes' may be explained by Tom's general interference
pattern/fading observation, which I believe to be correct.

Which brings me to the point of this post...

It seems that some contesters feel it's OK to split a stack, and
off-point the stacked antennas.  Top on EU, or JA, and
lower on SA.  Or, the upper 2 stacked in the run direction, and
the lower one pointed to pick up stray mults.  These things are 
within 1 wavelength of each other, and have to interact.  

Tom observes that the pattern resulting from two co-fed antennas 
is the vector sum of the two patterns.  

on key bands, N2RM has main towers with stacks, and secondary 
towers with single yagi's at 70' or so, for mult chasing.  These
are separated horizontally by several wavelengths.  I never noticed
any interaction.  Played well.   

It's never easy to judge performance in the heat of battle, but
my feeling has been that splitting and offpointing a stack has
had compromised results.  I wonder what others have observed.

n2ea
jimjarvis@ieee.org 

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>