Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations
From: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 at 00:37:06 <isp@bnjcomp.com> wrote:

> So I can compare where do I find what "normal" or 
> "average" soil conditons means?

One would expect to be able to find something about the assumed soil conditions 
somewhere in the drawing notes, typically in the notes to the foundation 
drawing(s).  

Normal soil usually has a specific, technical meaning. One will commonly see a 
drawing note such as: "Foundations designed in accordance with ANSI/TIA/EIA 
normal soil" or other words to that effect. 

EIA-222-F defines normal soil as: 

"A cohesive soil with an allowable net vertical bearing capacity of 4000 pounds 
per square foot and an allowable net horizontal pressure of 400 pounds per 
square foot per lineal foot of depth to a maximum of 4000 pounds per square 
foot."

Be warned though, the "normal" soil defined in EIA-222 is just a set of 
parameters intended for bidding purposes so quotes can be prepared and compared 
on a common basis when the customer does not provide a geotechnical report as 
part of an RFQ. 

EIA-222 calls it normal soil but the mechanical properties are not the 
properties of an average soil; some properties of "normal" soil are quite 
atypical. 

As one example, normal soil is defined as having an allowable bearing pressure 
of 4000 psf. There are soils that do have an allowable bearing pressure that 
meets or exceeds 4000 psf, but they are extreme cases. Under the UBC only a  
Class 1 material, described as massive crystalline bedrock, is presumed to have 
a allowable bearing pressure of 4000 psf without a test. 

And another example, the lateral pressure per unit depth for normal soil is 
defined as of 400 psf/ft. Again, this value lies towards the extreme high end 
for typical soils. And it is a parameter that's very relevant for a 
self-supporting tower as it directly effects the ability of a foundation design 
to resist overturning moments.

Whether the standard foundation design for "normal soil" shown on the 
manufacturer's drawings meets performance or code requirements for a specific 
set of soil properties is something that needs to be verified by a 
civil/structural engineer. 
 
Those who proceed to build a foundation to the drawing without checking the 
validity of the design assupmtions don't often encounter immediate, 
catastrohpic failure because of the safety factors built into the standard 
foundation design.

And don't assume that the standard foundation design has been substantially 
over-engineered in order to cover all or most cases. The foundation design for 
normal soil is used as a quoting standard. A manufacturer is not going to 
deliberately place itself at a competitive disadvantage by designing a 
foundation that requires more cubic yards of concrete than what's needed to 
achieve the safety factors specified in the EIA-222 standard.    

73,
Mike K1MK
--
Michael Keane K1MK
k1mk@alum.mit.edu
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>