Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 question from new antenna

To: "Peter Dougherty (W2IRT)" <w2irt@comcast.net>,towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 question from new antenna
From: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:05:06 +0100 (CET)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I'd  suggest loading the tower as a vertical. Especially if you have beam on 
top to provide top loading. For me, this approach beats the hell out of the 
dipole on 80, and goes beautifully on 160 - unless you want to work stuff 
within 200 to 300 miles at night. Then it's a 'so so' antenna

A 160m dipole at 60 feet isn't really going to be a DX antenna.
73 es HNY
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>