Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] why not regalvanize?

To: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] why not regalvanize?
From: "Dubovsky, George" <George.Dubovsky@andrew.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:34:56 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Jarvis
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 12:19 PM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] why not regalvanize?
> 
> 
> In addition, most galvanizers won't touch a rusted
> structure.  You can't zinc plate over iron oxide.
> So if you see internal rust, it's probably a lost cause.
> 
> n2ea
> 

Not true at all. The sequential baths at the galvanizer's plant include
an acid dip that takes off all rust and active metals like previous zinc
plating. Of course, if you leave it in long enough, it would also attack
the base steel. This is why galvanizers won't take anything painted -
they don't have anything in the process line that will strip paint. But
rust or mill scale? Gone...

73,

geo - n4ua

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>