Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant

To: "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant
From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:45:03 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi Jerry

Well, I have one tree.  It is about 80-90 feet high.  Right now I have an 80 
meter inverted V and a 160 meter inverted L hanging on it.  I have some 
other shorter trees, 40-50 feet, around here that I could hang a dipole in, 
but that's really not all that high on 40.   73
Tom W7WHY

 >If you have an 80  ft tower I can think of many better antennas to >put on 
it.
>
> If you have an 80 ft tree, you could put up a half wave sloping dipole 
> that would beat a vertical  in some directions.  If you have two 80 ft 
> trees, you could put up a horizontal dipole that would beat the half 
> sloper and the vertical.
>
> Jerry, K4SAV
>
> Tom Osborne wrote:
>
>>Hi all
>>
>>I have a 40 meter vertical with a bunch (50 or 60) radials.  I also have
>>been thinking of putting up a 40 meter vertical dipole.  Is there any
>>advantage to either or antenna.  Which works best for long haul contacts?
>>Thanks and 73
>>Tom
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>