Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] new tower

To: towertalk@contesting.com, km1h@jeremy.mv.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] new tower
From: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:25:52 EDT
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 7/14/2007 8:46:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
towertalk-request@contesting.com writes:

>  The tower will still move but it is not twisting as in  winding up to a 
point 
of possible fracture. The commercial site over on  the next hill had 140' of 
45G with the base buried in concrete and a bunch  of sticks on it. After 
about 15 years the bottom section fractured. The  tower didnt collapse but 
they replaced it with 55G on the same pad but  drilled it for a pin.
 
    There is practically no movement of a  tower at the base. Any torquing of 
the tower due to wind forces is pretty much  absorbed by the upper part of 
the tower - it doesn't really twist the whole  structure uniformly. A typical 
ham tower with a big 40M antenna will  definitely move at the top but not at 
the 
bottom.
 
    I'm surmising that the aforementioned failure was  due to lack of leg 
moisture drainage resulting in a freezing split leg and  subsequent failure. 
 
    Of course big loads and big wind torque forces  are pretty much 
eliminated with six-way guying using a star bracket. 
 
Cheers,
Steve     K7LXC
TOWER TECH 



 



************************************** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>