Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please

To: KA9S 3 <ka9s3@comcast.net>, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please
From: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:02:58
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Jeff,
I had a KLM 4el "Big Sticker" 40 meter and was plagued with insulators
deteriorating in the heat and ultra violet of the Arizona sun. I made some
Lexan insulators that worked ok.
I finally gave up though on that antenna and built a full size 40. Really a
big difference. The old KLM was when turned into a 3 element 30 meter beam.
73 Hardy N7RT


At 04:27 PM 8/13/2007 -0500, KA9S 3 wrote:
>I have a chance to buy a used two element linearly loaded 
>?shortie-fourty? beam at a low price. It is a KLM 40M-2B. I am a CW only 
>operator, so bandwidth isn?t of much concern to me. I would be putting 
>it up at 75 ft.
>
>I would like people?s general opinions about this beam compared to other 
>two element loaded 40m beams. Are there any endemic shortcomings with 
>the KLM beam (other than the company is out of business ? M2 now gives 
>some support)? Do the lexan element-to-boom saddles hold up?
>
>Thanks ? Jeff ? KA9S
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>