Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] spiderbeam plastic telescope to support Inv V

To: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spiderbeam plastic telescope to support Inv V
From: "Alex Malyava" <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:44:51 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
it gonna be unguyed, but attached somehow to the house, using L-brackets or
something like that at the very top - at 27' above the ground.
I have plenty of plastic and aluminum military 4-footers, but came up with
idea that plastic telescopes gonna be much lighter, like 10 pounds instead
of 50 :)


On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net> wrote:

> "What if i use lower 40-50' portion of their 60-footer? Is it gonna say
> straight?"
>
> Guyed?  Unguyed?
>
> You won't be able to put much balun up very high, in any case, honestly.
> You might consider running ladder line down the pole, an electrical half
> wavelength of it, and putting the balun there.  You'll have some extra
> ladder line if you're doing the 80m version, but maybe it can continue down
> the house or you can loosely coil it on a messenger line.
>
> The poles are overall pretty sturdy.  I put up a half-wavelength (not a
> typo) voltage fed inverted L for 40m as a temporary installation on my 40
> foot pole, 40 feet up and 26' out "horizontally" from the tip. That was
> 18AWG wire and then maybe 20 more feet of light cord to a tree.  The pole
> bent like a fishing rod does but I didn't have more than a few feet of sag
> in the "horizontal" section.  I only had the first (bottom) section guyed.
>
> The 60 footer is not really designed to have the same proportions as the 40
> footer... the tip section of the 60 footer is thinner than the tip section
> of the 40 footer.  The 60 footer is more designed to be a vertical antenna
> support for the low bands.   It's overall a more flexible object under its
> own weight and wind loads.
>
> The bottom sections are big and stiff, so it would be certainly be better
> than the 40 footer at a given height for supporting wire antennas... but it
> tapers down aggressively at the top, I think so that it doesn't get too
> topheavy for people who want to tip up a vertical.
>
> 73,
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>