Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?

To: w4mja@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?
From: k2qmf@juno.com
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:01:33 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

 Y E S...

Ted  K2QMF

 
On Sun, 3 May 2009 14:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Michael Almeter <w4mja@yahoo.com>
writes:
> 
> Hello All,
>     I've got a question, concerning the inverted L antenna. In all 
> the books I've found, it states that one wants the vertical section 
> "As high as possible". If one had a 133' tree or tower, would it 
> just be wise to run all the wire vertically, instead of vertically 
> and horizontally?
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> Mike Almeter
> W4MJA
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 
 
____________________________________________________________
Prices, software, charts & analysis.  Click here to open your online FX trading 
account.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTIyVjZ4bsUsOYyYiSnIHesPC3B7DsX0PJSpIbulLquzkO4HQp7ESc/
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>