Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!

To: "Jim Miller KG0KP" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>, "Dave LaBat" <labatd@ca.rr.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
From: "Ed McGrath" <w5iok@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:38:38 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I don't think the Ham-Law Mailing list exists anymore. I have tried to join 
and get a message, No such mailing list: @mail.altlaw.com

Ed, W5IOK
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Miller KG0KP" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>
To: "Dave LaBat" <labatd@ca.rr.com>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!


> This kind of stuff needs to (also?) be on the Ham-Law reflector -
>
> The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not purport
> to give legal advice.
> Submissions:  ham-law@mail.altlaw.com
> Subscribe and unsubscribe:    listserver@mail.altlaw.com
> Use "(un)subscribe ham-law@mail.altlaw.com" on a new line in the text.
>
> 73, de Jim KG0KP
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dave LaBat" <labatd@ca.rr.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>
>
>> Ok, their presentation is a little "different" but perhaps the esteemed
>> members of this list would like to read the city of Palmdale's proposal
>> that
>> is going before the city council tonight. The recommendation and
>> justification is at
>> http://www.cityofpalmdale.org/city_hall/Planning/2009-07/AMeeting/spl70978h.pdf
>> it is more than a little scary. The contention of the city council is 
>> that
>> the city may have lost in court, but the court told us how we can make it
>> unreasonable for any radio amateur to have any antennas that are 
>> effective
>> and we can do it legally, so we will.
>>
>> If I read the proposal correctly to have a tower than is no more than 25
>> feet higher than an existing structure you must get all your neighbors
>> signatures saying they have no objection, you must justify why you need
>> THAT
>> MUCH height, you must tell the city how much power you will use (???) and
>> the city can hire a "consultant" to determine if your justification is
>> reasonable..... at YOUR expense. Want to guess how much putting in 5
>> sections of 25G just went up to in the city of Palmdale, if you can do it
>> all?
>>
>> I understand why they are excited.
>>
>> Dave NT6AA
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <kq6i@arrl.net>
>> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>
>>
>>> Titled "Antenna Envy".
>>>
>>> rgrds
>>> Craig
>>> kq6i
>>> Peace, long-life, and gud DX!
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: N7mal [mailto:n7mal@citlink.net]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:52 AM
>>> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>>
>>> Didn't I see those 2 in a porn flick....   :-)
>>>
>>> MAL
>>> N7MAL
>>> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
>>> http://www.n7mal.com
>>> Everyone in the world is
>>> entitled to be burdened
>>> by my opinion
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Pete Smith
>>> To: D.G.
>>> Cc: wosborne44@gmail.com ; TOWERTALK@contesting.com ; john@kk9a.com
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:33
>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>>
>>>
>>> This guy again?  He must think we've forgotten the last round.
>>>
>>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2009 8:57 PM, D.G. wrote:
>>>> City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d5B9UPw_10
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>