| To: | e-Goups Towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipoles |
| From: | Stu Ritter <ritter@privatei.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:14:32 -0700 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I would like to thank everyone who has added information to this discussion. I would like to throw another question into the fray. Would it be possible to make the vertical dipole "Helically wound" as that recent article on the 160M vertical had done. again, thanks for this very interesting discussion. Stu N0LEF _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Vertical Dipoles, DF3KV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] How Helically Wound Verticals Really Work (was : Vertical dipoles), Rick Karlquist |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipoles, John Tait |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] How Helically Wound Verticals Really Work (was : Vertical dipoles), Rick Karlquist |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |