Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height
From: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:35:14 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 12/2/2011 1:03 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
> The wind load capacity of a 90 foot freestanding tower compared to a 70
> foot freestanding tower is so greatly different that I'm not sure I
> would put the 90 footer into the "cost-effective" category.

Even guyed towers start to get pricey "up there" and beyond.

73

Roger (K8RI)
>
> 73,
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
> On 12/2/2011 8:46 AM, Jan Erik Holm wrote:
>> With that criteria I would use a 90 ft tower.
>>
>> 73 Jim SM2EKM
>> ----------------
>> On 2011-12-02 16:17, Steve Hunt wrote:
>>> Of course! But the OP specifically said:
>>>
>>> "single multiband beam 40 - 10. No stacks."
>>>
>>> Steve G3TXQ
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/12/2011 14:59, K1TTT wrote:
>>>> That's what stacks are for!
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>