On 10/26/2013 3:34 PM, Richard Solomon wrote:
That just shows the failings of SS Amps. A 1.3:1 SWR equates to 1.7%
reflected power. Any
Amp that can't handle that has no place in my shack.
I disagree. It's not a fault in the amp. Your and my tube amp "have
tuners built in" called a PI or PI/L network that matches the high plate
impedance to the low impedance of the antenna system. If you put the
equivalent tuner at the output of the SS amp it too will operate into a
wide range of impedances.
When operated into a low SWR the SS amp doesn't need a tuner.
The short comings of the SS amp are not an inability to operate into a
high SWR, but rather the fragility of solid state devices. Where a tube
can swallow a voltage spike, even one lasting a tiny fraction of a
second will render the SS device inoperative. The same is true of
exceeding the dissipation rating of the device. Most tubes used in QRO
have a lot of mass, presenting a large thermal inertia while even power
transistors have a die with a mass of a few grams, hence little or no
tolerance for excessive dissipation.
SS amps require sophisticated and fast protection from, voltage,
current, over drive, temperature and SWR. As was mentioned, when they
are operated into a load that is not closely matched IM products go up
and the power goes down. If you ran a tube amp with the output impedance
fixed, wouldn't it do the same or similar?
Many of today's hams have trouble properly tuning and operating Tetrode
amps resulting in increased IM products. A given tube also, usually has
a plate voltage where IM products are minimized. Granted, Triodes are a
little easier to tune, but more than a few abuse the tubes in those as
well. However, many tube amps now come with much the same protection as
do SS amps, when in the old days you "might" find a glitch resistor.
Even "top end amps" back then had little more than a circuit breaker for
the AC power source. It was up to the operator not to blow the grids
out of those Hallicrafters and Collins amps. Whether Triode or Tetrode,
protective circuitry was pretty much non existent.
As for tube amps, just shows the benefits of a tuneable Pi-Network.
I am surprised the Quadra was that bad.
I think you will find that SS QRO amps are all quite similar in
tolerating SWR although devices are becoming more rugged. OTOH many of
the high power and SWR handling are for pulse service rather than for CW
and SSB, let alone, digital.
Even with my QRO amp, I use a VNA through a tuner to match the antenna
system so the rig sees a very low SWR.
I use an A/B switch, select the bar graph tune function and match the
system to a very low swr QUICKLY. I then tune the amp into a dummy load
knowing the settings ahead of time. A tune up only takes a few seconds.
With this approach the using a SS amp would be little different than the
tube amp except for not needing the extra tuning step.
73
Roger (K8RI)
73, Dick, W1KSZ
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Mark Robinson <markrob@mindspring.com>wrote:
I looked at the LPDA and wasn't impressed by the front to back ratio, so I
installed an Optibeam OB11-5. I have been very happy with it.
Mark N1UK
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Smith N4ZR" <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, 26 October, 2013 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions
My Yaesu Mark 5 would begin to roll back its power output over about
1.8:1. What really bugs me about LPDA's is the terrible tradeoff between
weight and size and gain/directivity at any given frequency.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 10/26/2013 1:56 PM, steve jobes wrote:
Rick I disagree with your statement. As a owner of a Tennadyne T-10 and
currently a T-12 your statement is flat out wrong. I swept my T-12 with my
rig expert AA-230 analyzer and it was below 2-1 across the 13-30 mhz.
range. Not sure what you are talking about, OR WHAT BRAND. But to say
mediocre SWR is a false statement.
73,
Steve W1DXH
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 25, 2013 7:25 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions
I briefly looked at log periodics and one thing
that hasn't been discussed here is the mediocre
SWR of LPDA's. You're pretty much going to have
to use a tuner, and you also have increased feedline
loss. Might work for some users, but I'm sticking
with my SteppIR antennas (3 of them so far).
An LPDA would however, make a good broadband receive
antenna for a skimmer, if you want to optimize
one direction.
Rick N6RK
______________________________**_________________
______________________________**_________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/towertalk<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>
______________________________**_________________
______________________________**_________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/towertalk<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>
______________________________**_________________
______________________________**_________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/towertalk<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>
______________________________**_________________
______________________________**_________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/towertalk<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|