Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Discoverer 7-2 or Cushcraft xm-240

To: Towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Discoverer 7-2 or Cushcraft xm-240
From: Tony Brock-Fisher <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:47:48 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have to second what Paul, W0AD said about the W6NL Moxon. I replaced a CC shorty-forty with the Moxon design and the difference is NIGHT AND DAY,

-For the first time EVER, I find a frequency on 40 (never a 'clear' one, just one where nobody comes yelling in your face to QSY). I call CQ for 10 minutes, and I notice that the frequency is getting QUIETER! Folks are moving away from me because I am LOUD.

-The SWR is much better than the shorty-forty. Even with 'secret' compromise settings, the shorty-forty will be over 2:1 when you go up high in the band - such as operating split in a SSB contest. With the Moxon, the SWR is below 1.5 anywhere - no need to retune the amp.

-There are no coil losses. Talking to W1JR, the coils on the shorty-forty are lossier than you think - as the bandwidth is wider, so the Q is lower, than predicted by modeling.

-The elements are longer, so they have more directivity in and of themselves. This adds to a better pattern, more forward gain.

All in all, between the coil losses and the directivity, I'd say it is ~4 db better than the shorty-forty in forward gain. That's a lot on 40m!

Contact me off-list for details. I built one from scratch and would do it again in a heartbeat.

-Tony, K1KP
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>