Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Fwd: TIC Potentiomenter

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: TIC Potentiomenter
From: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 23:38:52 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
There are (or "were') sealed (that is; O-ring equipped shaft and hermetic 
electric feed-through connectors) available. They are normally under military 
specifications and fairly expensive unless you get they surplus. I guess they 
should survive better in a rotor location. 


Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Sanborn <cc-6569@comcast.net>
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, Apr 2, 2014 7:59 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TIC Potentiomenter


John,
     I agree the Vishay 10T pot does not seem to be a good solution. I 
"worked" the pot back and forth more today and it never came back enough 
to be able to use the RT-21 without the "no motion" error message 
again.  We did have a sever winter here in N. IL with a good amount of 
precipitation.  However, I just did a pot replacement and put the rotor 
back in service September so I am very disappointed.

     I am serious when I put the question out there to the TowerTalk 
community.  Has anyone considered or implemented a redesign of the TIC 
ring rotor direction indication method to get away from the dreaded 
unreliable pot?

     TNX es 73,  Fred  KG9X
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>