Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Coax Length

To: Towertalk Reflector <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Coax Length
From: Mike Fahmie via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Mike Fahmie <wa6zty@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:12:24 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My post triggered an unexpected flurry of replies!  Yes, there are various ways 
to measure coax lengths, both electrical lengths and physical lengths.  The 
purpose of my post was to describe a way that a rough measurement of length 
could be done using the commonly available 'Capacitance' measuring capability 
of many DVM's (network analyzer not required!).  I was surprised at how 
accurate it was, but noted that I might have just been lucky.

9913 coax has greater susceptibility to propagation of water than solid or foam 
coax, no argument there.  My installation uses 9913F7 foam on the tower and 
9913 on the run from the tower to the lightening panel 70' away.  Most of that 
run is sheltered from the weather and I'm using Type N connectors throughout 
the system and sealed with self fusing tape so I'm not too worried about water 
intrusion.
Solid/foam coax is not immune to water propagation. Back in my novice days 
(well back in the last century), I had a coax fed dipole which I constructed 
without any attempt to seal the antenna end of the RG-59.  I learned about 
capillary action when I found a small puddle at the radio end of that 80' run.  
I doubt that this thin layer of water affected the attenuation much unless the 
polyethylene absorbed it, but in the long run it would probably corrode the 
shield wires.  The issue is different with 9913 since a large gap exists 
between the center conductor and the insulating tube surrounding it.  If water 
collects there, it's all over!
-Mike-WA6ZTY

From: Roger (K8RI) on TT <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
 To: towertalk@contesting.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:41 PM
 Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Coax Length
   
On 10/28/2014 8:05 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 2:39 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
>> For TDR (or looking for integer half wavelengths as you sweep the 
>> frequency on an analyzer) you have to assume a particular propagation 
>> factor,
>

Not only that, there are often small variations in a single length. 
There are likely small variations in 4 lengths that long cut from a 
single spool.  So they may be different electrical lengths.

With a good TDR you can measure the characteristics and find the 
electrical lengths at a given frequency.

73

Roger (K8RI)

> Mike,
>
> Measuring the length of a long piece of transmission line is tricky 
> for several reasons, most important because Vf (the velocity factor) 
> varies a bit with frequency.  Study k9yc.com/Coax-Stubs.pdf
>
> An easy way to get close to the actual length is to put a connector on 
> one end, leave the other end open, and measure the impedance with an 
> antenna analyzer. At every frequency where it's some odd multiple of 
> quarter waves long, it will look like a short. So sweep it with 
> whatever analyzer you own, write down those frequencies, and do the 
> arithmetic.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


-- 

73

Roger (K8RI)




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


   
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>