Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:57:54 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would add that lightening usually comes in via these other routes far more often than the tower(s) depending on station location and height of the towers.

73

Roger  (K8RI)


On 1/14/2016 Thursday 1:05 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Wed,1/13/2016 3:58 PM, Bruce Jungwirth wrote:
You said it. NEC is concerned with 60 Hz safety, not RF.

Lighting IS RF. It is not a DC event. It is not even a low frequency event.

Yes, NEC is concerned with safety. That includes lightning, electrical shock, and fire. It is a BUILDING CODE, and it carries the force of LAW when it is adopted by the local authority having jurisdiction over a given building. Specifically, it is a set of MINIMUM requirements.

Yes, earth connections are important for lightning protection, but the most critical element for all of those concerns is BONDING, not the perfection of earth connections.

As hams, we zero in on antennas as the conductor that brings lightning into our homes, while in reality, lightning comes in on power lines, telephone lines, and CATV systems too.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


--

73

Roger (K8RI)


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>