To: | towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R |
From: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:49:05 -0600 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
> What IS complicated is how so many clearly have some kind of stake in > it NOT being true. I wouldn't call it "some kind of stake" as much as simple doubt because what you assert is, to be charitable, unsupported by observation. >Someone with a low band dipole in the air using unstripped THHN may be >paying quite a penalty, especially if it's been up a long time. How long is "a long time?" Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at RF., Guy Olinger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R, Bob K6UJ |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Terminations, Wes Stewart |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R, Guy Olinger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |