Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Booms

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Booms
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:07:30 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
How does the square boom handle torsional forces compared to a round boom?

73, Roger (K8RI)

On 3/11/2017 11:16 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:12:43 -0600
From: Ed Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Booms

Hey Troops-

I've been around for a while, always wondered about this. Looking at the
discussion
of square vs round booms. How come the elements are on top of the round
boom?
Seems like less inclination to rotate out of alignment if they were
already on the bottom ...

ed K0KL.

##  Nobody mounts els on top of the round booms, they all mount below.
Since the els sag at their tips, I see no advantage to mounting els  below
the round or square boom.  With eles  mounted below a boom,   you now have
the entire weight of the ele, plus any ice loading, sitting on the mounting 
bolts,
like those used on stauff clamp assy..which are only the .25 – 20 variety.
If els mounted on top, you have zero weight on the bolts, or u bolts.
Thats not that big a deal, except for maybe 40m eles, in
which case you would have at least 2 x ss  u bolts on each side..or a min of 2 x
stauff clamps per side.

##  I would still like to know if I have the maths correct  as far as a 4 inch 
round boom
vs  a 3 inch square boom.

## A 3 inch square boom has a section modulus of   1.323
A 4 inch round boom has a section modulus of 1.45

## A 3 inch rectangular boom that is say has 40 ft long has a projected area of 
exactly 10 sq ft.
A 4 inch round boom that is the same 40 ft long has a projected area of exactly 
 13.332 sq ft.

##  Both latest eia- tia  and also ubc-97 D specs say to multiply any flat 
surface  by 2.0
Round tubes are multiplied by just 1.2

##  so the effective area of the 3 inch sq boom ends up being  10 x 2 =  20 sq 
ft.
The effective area of the 4 inch round boom ends up being  13.332 x 1.2  =  
15.998 sq ft
20  / 15.998    =  25%  more effective surface area for the 3 inch sq boom.

## Bending moment of a cylinder or tube is just section modulus X yield 
strength.   This is how they
calculate  the max stress where your mast enters the top of the tower, or at 
any point along the length
of a yagi ele.   Of course, with greater effective surface areas and or longer 
eles or a longer tower mast, the
stress increases fast like.
IF the same format Is used for  square  tubing, then the round boom reigns 
supreme..hands down.  Round boom
has a bigger section modulus... by 9.6 %.   1.45 / 1.323 = 1.09599  = 9.6%     
The sq boom has 25 %  more effective surface area.

##  mounting els  to a round or sq boom is a no brainer, several methods will 
work on each type.   Thats a moot point.
If Im correct, I see no advantage to the square boom.   Its a helluva lot 
weaker vs a round boom, assuming the circumference
and yield strength is identical in both cases.....and both booms are the  same 
length.

Jim  VE7RF

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


--

73

Roger (K8RI)


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>