Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Nested 4-Squares

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Nested 4-Squares
From: "David Robbins" <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:59:10 -0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My experience with 40m inside 80m says it is a bad idea.

David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://wiki.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://k1ttt.net:7373



-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of N5KM
- Kris
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 19:24
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Nested 4-Squares

Is nesting 4-Square arrays a good idea? By that I mean, for instance, an 80m
4-square inside a 160m 4-square. I was about to model this but it occurs to
me that someone has probably already done this exercise.

Good idea or bad idea?

Kris N5KM
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>