On 9/12/19 12:42 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
I have two very different takes on this. First, traps are an inefficient
way to build a multi-band antenna. That means they suck up gain. Also,
because the elements are shorter, their radiation efficiency is reduced.
The best multiband antennas don't use traps.
I'm not so sure about the efficiency aspect for shorter antennas - sure,
for "very short", the matching network losses will increase, but the
actual antenna efficiency isn't different (I^2*R losses are usually
pretty low)
Take a 6 meter long dipole as an example. REsonant at roughly 24 MHz -
here's the feedpoint impedance
f r x
23.6 77.6359 -12.4921
23.8 79.7763 -2.8992
24 81.976 6.6949
24.2 84.237 16.2932
24.4 86.5613 25.8988
Now let's drop to 18 MHz, so the dipole would be 75% of resonant length
f r x
17.6 33.6036 -316.66
17.8 34.6034 -305.433
18 35.6276 -294.325
18.2 36.6769 -283.331
18.4 37.7518 -272.445
So you'd need some sort of matching network to cancel out the 300 ohm
reactance. It's pretty easy to come up with a coil that has a Q of 200,
so the 300 ohm coil would have a resistance of 1.5 ohms. Compared to the
36 ohm radiation resistance, that's about 4% or 0.2 dB.
At 50% length:
11.8 12.9553 -732.472
12 13.4523 -713.564
12.2 13.9618 -695.14
Now we're starting to be significant, a inductor Q of 200 is going to be
around 3.5 ohms loss resistance, and against 13.5 ohms antenna R, that's
a 20% loss (1 dB).
Of course, for many HF links, on receive, the SNR is determined by the
atmospheric noise, and antenna gain (for lowish gain antennas < 10dB)
doesn't change the received SNR - the reduced gain drops both the
desired signal and the noise level.
For transmit, of course, it does affect the SNR that the other end sees.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|