SYLVAN wrote:
>I saw your posting. It is loaded with info. I wonder, should we design a
simple reporting form
>Perhaps ... like
>TR version: 6.59
>Icom model: 736
>Command: RIGHT/LEFT Shift
>Problem: Does not work
----------------
Excellent idea, Sylvan. I toyed with only reporting the info that pertained
to what didn't work----then I thought it was important to confirm that some
things did work. So that is why mine was overly long.
I certainly agree that if everyone does the long form, then Tree is going
to be overloaded just looking at the incoming data.
Perhaps we should acknowledge a priority on the problems, i.e. "my most
pressing concern is that:"
Followed, perhaps, by only one or two more.....
Just a thought.
Another thought, my IC-725 is no longer in production, and it is not a very
popular radio. I happen to be one of the few to have one and when Murphy
put my other rig, an FT 847 off the air during the CQWW, I was faced with
either contesting WITHOUT computer-control, or contesting WITH
limited-function-computer-control. I chose the latter. Honestly, I
wouldn't be using the IC-725 except in an emergency, or if someday I tried
SO2R.
ALSO, I am well aware that Tree fixing a problem for a guy with an IC725
(me) might well be solving ONLY ONE PERSON"S NEEDS!!!! And I suggest Tree
puts the IC-725 problems near the bottom end of his priority list.
Thanks, and 73 de alan
Alan Kaul, W6RCL, LaCanada, CA
w6rcl@amsat.org
http://home.att.net/~alan.kaul/index.html
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|