HI all,
with statement set to CALLSIGN UPDATE ENABLE = TRUE, in case of doubts
mentioned, I write complete corrected callsign into exchange window
(although it slows you down a bit). I think that *complete* corrected call
should be send in any case of doubts, so other side is sure that you
received his call correctly and he/she could correct you, if you still have
his/her call wrong. Cleanness of your log is worth more than QSO/hour
rates...
73,
Mirko, S57AD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Beckwith" <swca@swbell.net>
To: <trlog@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: [TRLog] Handling of "?" at end of call sign
>
> Tim, N4GN said:
>
> >since I also deleted the "?" from
> >the end of the call, TR Log thinks
> >I also "corrected" the suffix,
>
> >Did anyone actually follow this?
>
> Not only did I follow it, but I agree completely. This would be a great
thing.
> If you got the call right but weren't sure, and you added a ? because you
wanted
> him to know you weren't sure, and he sent it again, and you realized you
had it
> right in the first place, TRlog should just move on and not use the CALL
OKAY
> NOW message just because you deleted the "?".
>
> Good thinking, Tim.
>
> Mark, N5OT
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
> Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
> Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|