[TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT

TRLog

[TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT

Subject:	[TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT
From:	n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)
Date:	Thu, 05 Dec 2002 14:26:28 -0400

Having read about the difference between using INPUT CONFIG FILE vs 
STDCFG.DAT, I cannot see the reason why anyone would want to use INPUT 
CONFIG FILE setting.

What kind of config info is the INPUT CONFIG FILE setting best used for?

73 Mike N2MG

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Mike Gilmer, N2MG <= [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, George Fremin III - K5TR [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Jim Smith [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Juhan Poldvere [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Mike Gilmer, N2MG [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Jim Smith [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Mike Gilmer, N2MG [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, Jim Smith [TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, KL7RA

Previous by Date:	[TRLog] Why no Ctrl-Fx keys in exchange mode?, Ron D. Rossi
Next by Date:	[TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, George Fremin III - K5TR
Previous by Thread:	[TRLog] Why?, Dale L Martin
Next by Thread:	[TRLog] INPUT CONFIG FILE vs STDCFG.DAT, George Fremin III - K5TR
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]