VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 222MHz Big Wheel Interest.

To: Leandra MacLennan <leandra@leandramac.com>, Grant Hopper <kb7wsd@gmail.com>, "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 222MHz Big Wheel Interest.
From: w3cmp via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: w3cmp <w3cmp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:57:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Yes.  They do not have as much gain as a big wheel.73, Chris Patterson W3CMP 
Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: Leandra MacLennan 
<leandra@leandramac.com> Date: 2/14/25  4:27 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: Grant Hopper 
<kb7wsd@gmail.com>, vhfcontesting@contesting.com Cc: w3cmp <w3cmp@comcast.net> 
Subject: RE: [VHFcontesting] 222MHz Big Wheel Interest. Have you looked at the 
Omniangle antennas from PAR 
Electronics?http://www.parelectronics.com/omnis.phpThey also sell stacking 
kitshttp://www.parelectronics.com/stacking-kits.phpI have PAR Omniangle 
antennas for 6M, 2M, 220 and 432 and used all them as a rover. I have been 
surprised at how well they perform. The 2M, 220 and 432 antennas are 
mechanically robust.   -Leandra AF1R-----Original Message-----From: 
VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting-bounces+leandra=leandramac.com@contesting.com> On 
Behalf Of Grant HopperSent: Friday, February 14, 2025 2:56 PMTo: 
vhfcontesting@contesting.comCc: w3cmp <w3cmp@comcast.net>Subject: Re: 
[VHFcontesting] 222MHz Big Wheel Interest.A couple of us here in Western WA 
purchased BigWheels and parts direct from WiMo last year.A couple of things we 
learned from that (research before and experience after receiving):  First is 
pay attention to customs fees.  Second is that a single Big Wheel is nice but 
other things do as well.  Where the Big Wheel stands out is with stacking a 
pair.  I and another ham have stacked 2m and 70cm.  The 6m model is so large 
that I need to prepare space specifically for it if I were to deploy a stacked 
set.  Phasing harnesses aren't hard, but the one that WiMo recommended was not 
correct.  We couldn't understand why performance was horrible until we actually 
examined the phasing harnesses we bought.  They weren't correct for that 
antenna and that setup.  I forget the details at the moment, but we ended up 
rolling our own so I'd recommend skipping WiMo's offering if you're going to 
stack.So I think the bottom line is that one should get a pair of 222 Big 
Wheels and stack.Speaking to Chris about the way WiMo might handle the 
order(s): my guess is that they would want you to aggregate the "orders" but 
that they would ship.  This is what would work best and avoid any import fee 
($800)  The shipper would collect that and it's not part of what WiMo charges 
(but they do charge for shipping.)  This shouldn't be at all hard for them to 
set up in their order system if they were serious about selling one.  It might 
be a hard sell though as 222 isn't a world wide thing so there is somewhat 
limited appeal (to really just the US.)So, I'd work out with them a way that 
they can take the payment and such, and you're simply a salesman for them, 
trying to get at least 40 units confirmed.  My gut is that even at a "new 
offering" price, a pair of 222MHz would be under 800, so I'd think that finding 
20 people nationwide that want a pair would be possible.  I certainly would 
consider it if I saw confirmed specs from WiMo (in other words, they built a 
stacked set as a test and did a real world confirmation of the design.)It would 
be interesting to see if someone in the US would license their design (I think 
ti's a good, strong approach) and we could buy direct with no overseas 
shipping, import fussing, and more simple than getting them from 
WiMo.73,GrantKB7WSDOn Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:04 AM w3cmp via VHFcontesting < 
vhfcontesting@contesting.com> wrote:> Buddy  -   Wimo will make them. I'm not 
sure if they will ship them> individually or whether I have to.  Right now I'm 
just trying to find > out if there is enough interest to proceed. Right now 
I've had > interest in 3 wheels.73,Chris Patterson W3CMP Sent from my Galaxy> 
-------- Original message --------From: Buddy Morgan <beamar@aol.com>> Date: 
2/14/25  1:51 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: w3cmp <w3cmp@comcast.net>> Subject: Re: 
222MHz  Big Wheel Interest.>         I can make that work. I currently have a 
M2 loop, side > mounted, on my tower. I will sign up. Have you thought about 
getting > them made, here in the United States? Maybe Terry at Directive 
Systems > would be interested?Buddy WB4OMG>>>>>>                         On 
Friday, February 14, 2025 at 01:46:56 PM > EST, w3cmp <w3cmp@comcast.net> 
wrote:>>>>                 Bubby:   Diameter of the 2 meter Big Wheel is 3.7 
ft; the> diameter of the 432MHz Big Wheel is is about 13.5".  Stacking distance 
is> 5/8 w/l.      Extrapolating the two diameters I would expect the diameter> 
of a 222MHz Big Wheel to be about 26".    The benefit of a Big Wheel over a> 
loop is that the Wheel has more gain than a loop, just about dBd.  A > loop has 
less gain than a dipole because it is a dipole folded into a > square shape.73, 
Chris Patterson W3CMP Sent from my Galaxy>>> 
_______________________________________________> VHFcontesting mailing list> 
VHFcontesting@contesting.com> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting>_______________________________________________VHFcontesting
 mailing 
listVHFcontesting@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>