WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] New %w command

To: "N1LN_TXU" <n1ln@txucom.net>, <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] New %w command
From: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:31:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Forget it - If the other guy thinks he hasn't worked you, he doesn't have
you in his log.  Just work him again and go on.  It's much faster than
arguing with back and forth I worked you, no you didn't, yes I did etc etc
etc.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "N1LN_TXU" <n1ln@txucom.net>
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 6:35 AM
Subject: [WriteLog] New %w command


> OK - so what am I doing wrong
>
> What I assume %W will do is:
>
> > if a dupe - send the information between the %b commands and, if used
> correctly - then CLEAR the call window
> > if not a dupe - skip over the info between the %b commands (where I
> thought the %w should be inserted) and send
> the exchange
>
> Here is my current F10 info:
>
> >       %C%b qso b4 ee n1ln test%b5NN tx
>
> Where would I put the %W ?
>
> I tried it between the %b commands and the call in the entry window is
> sent - and the entry window is cleared - dupe
> or not
>
> I tried it after the last %b commands - sends the call and dupe or not -
> clears the window
>
> I tried it before the first %b - sends the call and dupe or not - clears
the
> window.
>
>
> So, it does clear the window - but is my assumption as to use correct?
>
> thanks,
> Bruce - N1LN
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
>


_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>