[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] WAE - CABRILLO

To: GL-DJ3IW-Web <GL-DJ3IW@web.de>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] WAE - CABRILLO
From: GW4BLE <steve.gw4ble@btconnect.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:23:22 +0100
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Interesting.   I've just been informed that Wintest (for example) tidies up QTC 
times to full four digit numbers  when the QTC is saved.


Sent from my iPhone 5S

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:01, GL-DJ3IW-Web <GL-DJ3IW@web.de> wrote:
> Steve,
> I have never used WL for a SSB or CW WAE - I only operate RTTY contests.
> So you could be right with just entering the minutes - just check the rules 
> and examples.
> 73 de Goetz DJ3IW
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: WriteLog [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. September 2015 16:28
>> An: GL-DJ3IW-Web <GL-DJ3IW@web.de>; <writelog@contesting.com>
>> <writelog@contesting.com>
>> Betreff: Re: [WriteLog] WAE - CABRILLO
>>> Oh.  That hasn't always been the case surely?    I always type the QTC
>> exactly as received from the DX station, the DX will say maybe the hour
>> for the first number and just the minutes for the others.
>> So.....I've had to edit my cabrillo file in order for the robot to accept
>> it. Had to do it several times in fact. This seems fundamentally wrong to
>> me. 'What-if' I made a mistake in this post contest editing and then got
>> penalised.   I make the point that we should log what is sent by the DX
>> station and should *not* edit it afterward.
>> Steve
>> Sent from my iPhone 5S
>>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 16:15, GW4BLE <steve.gw4ble@btconnect.com> wrote:
>>> Re:
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>