Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:amps@myrealbox.com: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [Amps] your operation (score: 1)
Author: "List Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:17:42 -0500
Gentlemen (and ladies): I'm sorry that this message made it to the list. I thought things had calmed down and turned off the moderation. Unfortunately, there are still those who cannot be trusted to
/archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00118.html (6,900 bytes)

2. RE: [Amps] Re: Reflector Text Only (score: 1)
Author: "List Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 02:01:20 -0400
ONLY "text only" e-mail is truly compatible with everyone. There are may e-mail programs that cannot display HTML e-mail and may even crash when receiving HTML e-mail. Your original message came fro
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00098.html (8,508 bytes)

3. RE: [Amps] TEXT Messages (score: 1)
Author: "List Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 02:01:21 -0400
Your original message came from AOL as "multi-part" ... one text part and one HTML part. All contesting.com lists use "Mime/Del" to strip off the HTML portion of the message as well as any attachmen
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00099.html (8,653 bytes)

4. [Amps] AM and Speech Processors ... (score: 1)
Author: "List Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:54:17 -0400
OK gentlemen ... The AM, HiFi SSB and speech processing threads have gone far enough. They have no business on an Amplifier list. I removed the moderation flag from the forum due to the need to spend
/archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00413.html (6,525 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] ARRL financials (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:28:26 -0500
Enough of the WinLink and ARRL Financials threads ... they are seriously off topic for a reflector on Amplifiers. Administrator, amps@contesting.com _______________________________________________ Am
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00201.html (7,847 bytes)

6. [Amps] Metric audio ... (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:26:29 -0400
OK folks, I've let it slide but both the metric and audio threads are a bit far removed from the charter of this group. Please bring things back a little closer to RF amplifiers (particularly those i
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00206.html (6,925 bytes)

7. [Amps] Appropriate Subjects for the AMPS Group ... (score: 1)
Author: "administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:40:41 -0400
Ok folks ... this is an amplifiers group. It is not a sociology or civil rights group. The complaining about CW examination requirements and other issues of the day is not welcome here. Anyone who co
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00795.html (11,369 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Read this- buyer beware- identity revealed (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:33:50 -0500
Now that the identity has been posted, this thread (and "buyer beware") should end now. This forum is not the place for any "bashing" but an occasional warning about less than honest sellers is fine.
/archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00694.html (10,270 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] FCC & 10 M Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:53:23 -0500
OK folks ... The FCC & 10 M Amps and Tokyo HP topics are now closed. Amplifiers for use in other services are off limits on this list except as they illustrate good construction and design techniques
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00343.html (7,980 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Not in this lifetime (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:52:05 -0500
That individual has been unsubscribed from AMPS. Let this serve as a warning ... anyone else who uses a server challenge/preauthorization spam filter and does not "whitelist" the group will also be u
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00576.html (8,216 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Threads - was idiocy - perhaps it still is (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:19:51 -0500
I guess this thread or series of threads isn't going to die on its own. Time to bring the activity here back to amplifiers or take it elsewhere ... I imagine Yahoo has a forum on international beers.
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00412.html (11,312 bytes)

12. [Amps] Topics here ... (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:07:44 -0500
Hey folks ... This is the Amps reflector - not the DAV network or military clothing reflector, etc. Nor is this reflector to be an advertising vehicle for surplus electronics outlets. Please keep the
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00742.html (6,678 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Paypal only (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:55:02 -0400
OK, Enough on PayPal ... Please keep the threads here to Amplifiers, components, etc. Test Equipment and books are also subjects that do not really belong on this reflector. Think before starting a t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00222.html (8,422 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Cal Lab (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:44:27 -0400
Gentlemen, This is *NOT* the "test and measurement forum." Please confine the topics here to amplifier related issues. Calibration standards, old test equipment and hand tools do not belong here ...
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00339.html (8,647 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:05:38 -0400
OK ... this thread has degenerated into the equivalent of grade school children fighting in a sandbox. It ends now! If you want to fight about power levels of contesters take it to cq-contest@contest
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00341.html (10,514 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:06:19 -0400
This thread is OVER. I have asked nicely once any further posts on this topic will result in the posters being removed from the list. 73, ... Administrator amps@contesting.com _______________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00355.html (11,491 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 19:23:14 -0400
Rich, That is uncalled for and inappropriate. If you continue with this line of personal attack, your postings will be held for review (moderation). After that point any continuation will result in y
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00072.html (10,675 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Moderation (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 09:26:11 -0400
Gene (and everyone else subscribed), Amps@contesting.com is a service of the team at Contesting.com and eHam.net. The sites were originally supported by W4AN on hardware and bandwidth supplied by his
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00099.html (10,150 bytes)

19. [Amps] FW: Changes to this Reflector (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:53:57 -0400
In view of recent comments on the list, I am forwarding a posting from the late Bill Fisher, W4AN. While the list is not returning to full moderation mode, please note Bill's comments on what is not
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00117.html (8,627 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] SELL: Ameritron AL1200 Contestor's Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:18:59 -0400
Rich, This stops right now! You will not badger anyone who offers data and support on this reflector as you have done so time and time again. If you have technical PROOF that contradicts the data off
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00357.html (10,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu