Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 433 ]

Total 433 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:56:35 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I stand corrected. Thank you. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00039.html (8,110 bytes)

262. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 21:23:24 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Did you miss where I said "when not abused"? I'm sure you are not personally abusing them, but something in the environment is and they are clearly not b
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00055.html (8,960 bytes)

263. Re: [Amps] rich Richard - tiny antenna (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 21:35:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Does that include FCC fines and attorney's fees? Over engineering is a rookie's mistake. Good engineers get paid the good $$$ to make the product adequat
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00057.html (8,297 bytes)

264. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 21:55:41 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Well, if you're into abusing, tubes are for you. Just don't drop one on a cement floor, be sure to keep the filament voltage within tolerance and resolde
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00059.html (8,710 bytes)

265. Re: [Amps] rich Richard - tiny antenna (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:11:28 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: As someone who has done both homebrew and owning a 9500, I can assure you that in terms of time and money spent, the 9500 is a far better investment. You
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00070.html (8,929 bytes)

266. Re: [Amps] Tubes, transistors, and 'abuse' (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:20:00 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Both tubes and transistors each have their own protection requirements. Treating a transistor like a tube or vice versa is asking for trouble. For one, t
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00071.html (9,112 bytes)

267. Re: [Amps] Tubes, transistors, and 'abuse' (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:25:03 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Manfred, Manfred, Manfred. Wrist straps and anti-static mats are always grounded through a high value resistor, one meg or more. You are safe. 73, Bill W
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00072.html (9,262 bytes)

268. Re: [Amps] Tubes, transistors, and 'abuse' (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:33:54 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: A MOSFET should never be placed on a metal surface in the first place. Either keep it in it's original anti-static bag or on an anti-static mat. Nothing
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00073.html (9,274 bytes)

269. Re: [Amps] Tubes, transistors, and 'abuse' (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:48:27 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The internal structure of a tube is very fragile, even if the glass or ceramic doesn't break. Even if the tube appears to work afterwards, something may
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00075.html (9,396 bytes)

270. Re: [Amps] blowing up CMOS (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:47:20 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: This method is better than nothing, but is still not adequate. As can be demonstrated with a static meter, your body is constantly generating static, eve
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00082.html (7,766 bytes)

271. Re: [Amps] blowing up CMOS (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:55:42 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The conductive surface must be designed to SLOWLY dissipate static. A metal surface is NOT safe because it dissipates static instantly and that will caus
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00083.html (7,564 bytes)

272. Re: [Amps] blowing up CMOS (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:20:33 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: And if you get really, REALLY serious, you keep the humidity close to 100%. Of course your next problem is finding workers who will tolerate that. :-) 73
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00086.html (7,968 bytes)

273. Re: [Amps] Mobile Amps ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:01:25 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Be careful with so much power in a mobile. Many newer cars are highly computerized and won't tolerate RFI. The owner's manual for my Chevy Cruze says don
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00100.html (7,519 bytes)

274. Re: [Amps] Mobile Amps ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:05:48 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: These folks have a wide range of parts and kits for solid state homebrew: http://www.communication-concepts.com/ 73, Bill W6WRT _________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00103.html (7,331 bytes)

275. Re: [Amps] HF power divider (and combiner) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:48:45 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The answer is you must control the phase relationship, i.e. they must be identical. As long as you have identical amplifiers with identical lengths of co
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00133.html (7,698 bytes)

276. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Re: FYI Visalia Attendees (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 02:01:08 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: A partial picture of an unknown amplifier. Details? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00144.html (7,567 bytes)

277. Re: [Amps] RF in Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 02:11:41 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: What's wrong with this airplane? Simple. You are assuming the ground plane i.e. the body of the airplane does not radiate. Not true. In the "far field" t
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00145.html (8,681 bytes)

278. Re: [Amps] Another day, another even bigger LDMOS / Elecraft KPA-1500 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:48:37 +0000
Thanks for that post, Mark. Looks like we are about to be inundated with anew generation of SS amplifiers. It's a good time to be a ham! 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) ________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00166.html (10,124 bytes)

279. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 00:21:04 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: U agree a lot of tubes may disappear but I suspect the 8877 will be around longer than we will. 73, Bill W6WRT __________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00177.html (7,623 bytes)

280. Re: [Amps] RF in Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 00:26:19 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Not surprising. At those frequencies even a short straight piece of wire has enough inductance to act as a choke. 73, Bill W6WRT ________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00178.html (7,038 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu