- 1. [AMPS] L-4B vs. L-7 (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 08:35:35 -0700
- I am considering trading up from an L-4B to an L-7. I know the L-7 has greater band coverage and QSK, but is it built as well and does it perform as well as my reliable L-4B? Experiences and comparis
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00130.html (7,102 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] L-4B vs. L-7 (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 09:32:27 -0700
- Not that I'm aware of, Rich. Having built-in QSK was one of the features I was once told was part of the L-7. I have an outboard Ameritron QSK-5 I could use, but it would have been nice to be able to
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00133.html (7,589 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] re:4-250A (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:17:50 -0700
- I'm confused, too. "Legal" requires a "law" defining what is legal. If Part 97 isn't that law, what is?? %( 73, Dick -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada Visit http://www.delphi.com/electronic/
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00284.html (9,127 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] re:4-250A (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:27:12 -0700
- I think the crux of the problem is that folks in the USA who ignore one part of Part 97 can be expected to ignore other parts when it suits them, too. But we digress.... this was supposed to be about
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00285.html (8,546 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] New Svetlana 3-500Z Replacement? (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 08:45:00 -0700
- Yesterday I tuned across the end of a QSO between two ops discussing a new Svetlana tube. It is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for the 3-500Z, but with an extra 100 watts of plate dissapation.
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00065.html (7,218 bytes)
- 6. [AMPS] Ceramic fuses (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 15:12:07 -0700
- Thanks for the breath of fresh air! :) -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada Visit http://www.delphi.com/electronic/ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contes
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00133.html (7,003 bytes)
- 7. [AMPS] Improvements to L-4B PS? (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 09:02:07 -0700
- The Drake L-4B has been characterized as a good amp with a marginal power supply. Are there any generally accepted mods to improve the power supply? 73, Dick -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevad
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00219.html (6,980 bytes)
- 8. [AMPS] Improvements to L-4B PS? (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 13:28:10 -0700
- I am interested more in increased reliability than in increased output. For example, would 1N5408's be a good replacement for the original diodes, etc? I have obtained an Ameritron QSK-5 in the hope
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00222.html (7,441 bytes)
- 9. [AMPS] good, bad, ugly (score: 1)
- Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 10:40:28 -0800
- Back in the 1 KW input days, it was said the venerable Drake L-4B could operate RTTY at full output more or less continuously. Was/is this is true statement? Was that old BA really that good? -- Dick
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00246.html (7,914 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu