Mail Archive Search: <+from:fisher@pldi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:fisher@pldi.net: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Slow coaxial relays (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 18:58:42 -0000; Hi Scott NX7U - You have indicated that the release times indicated are after 0vdc; so, the following obviously won't be the answer if you are getting an accurate 0vdc measurement at the coils. Anywa; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00334.html (9,413 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 4CX1000 Socket (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 21:07:14 -0000; Am considering bidding on a tube socket on eBay - it is described as an Eimac Y-511. Can someone give me some info on that part number? I can't find any reference to it on the web nor in my Varian Po; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00216.html (7,128 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Confucius say - 3cx800 - Apology (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:08:54 -0000; No 3cx800's here. But I do have some rheostats, transistors and pills. Thanks Will, thanks everyone, and thank goodness everything is back to normal. For on this reflector (roller coaster ride) I see; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00373.html (8,375 bytes)
4. [AMPS] apology (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:55:32 -0000; Yes. Yes. And, I have already seen a few and I must say that, in the heat of it all, you rate right up there with the best of them. the I think you are right, again. Of course, if everyone did it the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00395.html (12,364 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Super Tuner Price (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:00:30 -0000; Hi Alek VK6APK - Don't know how "Down Under" prices compare to those in US - but here goes anyway. Am not exactly sure which tuner you are considering. I have a Dentron "Monitor Tuner" which has stam; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00082.html (10,458 bytes)
6. [AMPS] ALC 3-500z (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:11:25 -0000; Have AL-80 (not A or B) with single 3-500Z. The manual indicates that it provides 0 - 30 negative volts for the transceiver input. The transceiver is an FT-757GX which manual indicates that the ALC i; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00137.html (7,625 bytes)
7. [AMPS] PEP philosophy/rules (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:05:19 -0000; Hi George - For one, I'm glad you brought this up. My understanding is that SSB PEP is one thing and the FCC PEP output rule is another. Actual PEP - if I understand correctly - is the power at the h; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00162.html (12,500 bytes)
8. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 01:57:00 -0000; Hi Ron K5BDJ & all - supplied the conditions."> a the FCC quote is correct - assuming, that is, the ARRL got it right. I copied and pasted it directly from their website The problem to me is not that; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00169.html (9,257 bytes)
9. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:29:48 -0000; So, are we talking about Peak Power (PP) here? Somehow everything seems to find its way back to the crapper. 73, Lu -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00190.html (9,476 bytes)
10. [AMPS] 4CX1000 (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 00:53:22 -0000; Am looking for a copy of the complete Eimac Data Sheet for the 4CX1000A/8168. I have a copy of the one-page Reference Data Sheet. Anyone know where I might find it on the web or have a copy that coul; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00209.html (6,983 bytes)
11. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:52:38 -0000; I think I finally got straightened out on this thanks to several in the group that took the time to answer my questions in detail - and, I had quite a few questions. My next two emails to this group; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00223.html (10,555 bytes)
12. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:53:39 -0000; COPY OF EMAIL FROM IAN G3SEK TO ME FROM THE OTHER DAY: Hello Luther reply): You got it! It's probably much shorter than 1/10th of a second. The narrowest, highest peak could be at the upper frequency; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00224.html (15,033 bytes)
13. [AMPS] PEP philosophy: TRYING (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 18:43:14 -0000; Am trying to get the 2nd email with the attachment to go through - Don't know what the problem is. I sent it first with the drawing attached. I sent it again with the drawing as a part of the email b; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00226.html (8,142 bytes)
14. [AMPS] PEP philosophy: TRYING (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 20:27:45 -0000; Thanks Rich AG6K - I couldn't even get it thru in the body of an html email. I guess html is not accepted, either. Anyone have a website for a temporary post of 62.4KB .jpg file? This has gotten to b; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00228.html (8,600 bytes)
15. [AMPS] PEP Philosophy - Finally (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:09:23 -0000; Hi to a FB bunch of Amplifier Lovers - Sorry for delay in getting this info to you. It turns out, that the software that contesting.com uses has a list of keywords that, if found in an email, will ca; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00239.html (8,408 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:39:11 -0000; correct Maybe it is simplistic, for me though, this is one of those areas where I've had to "clean my glasses ... clear the head" a bunch of times (""borrowed from Terry W6RU). But first, don't forge; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00283.html (11,750 bytes)
17. [AMPS] SB-220 conundrum (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 22:34:24 -0000; Hi Pete N4ZR - I can't help but wonder if you haven't had this situation all along and that your new relays (or something to do with their installation) exposed it. I call this a situation rather tha; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00398.html (12,598 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Tank coils (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 22:49:33 -0000; By the way, what is the easiest way to neatly wind a coil from 1/4" copper tubing to say 1 1/2' dia. I have heard that to heat it up first, then quickly cool it will soften it and make it easier to w; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00399.html (6,758 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Re: Tank coils (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:54:20 -0000; Hi All - Thanks for all replies. I got a small tubing bender just for the occasion and experimented with it without sand or trying to soften the tubing. I was surprised out how difficult it was to wo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00411.html (8,592 bytes)
20. [AMPS] SB-220 conundrum (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:57:04 -0000; Howdy Pete N4ZR and Amp nuts - I have heard that you can test for VHF parasitics by disconnecting the RF input and RF output from your amp and then, with the relay closed (ie, HV etc. applied)watch t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00429.html (8,768 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]