Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb0nly@mchsi.com: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:14:56 -0500
Glen, I visually compared my set of Taylors to the other ones marked Shuguang that i first bought, and your right they are higher quality. You can see the difference in the ones that are being sold n
/archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00393.html (10,543 bytes)

82. Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:19:12 -0500
I saw a pair of NOS Cetrons on eBay about two weeks ago, they went for about $270 for the pair. I wonder how good they are after sitting on a shelf for 30+ years? I imagine they might be a bit gassy
/archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00394.html (9,843 bytes)

83. Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:41:27 -0500
If the 572's ever go in my SB-200 and there isn't a good source of replacements I will just convert it to a GI7B and then I have two amps running the same tube. Buy up some spares and I can run for a
/archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00400.html (11,138 bytes)

84. [Amps] Large Transformer for Sale... (score: 1)
Author: KBØNLY <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:46:07 -0500
Anyone need a large low voltage transformer? I have one that came out of an old HP variable power supply, 30A at 50V max rating. Tested the transformer ands it working fine. The power supply died whe
/archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00431.html (7,104 bytes)

85. Re: [Amps] Heathkit SB220 manual (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:26:38 -0500
of such only those who pay for the privilege to redistribute them can do so. I see BAMA has removed some but not all of the heathkit manuals. There is about a dozen websites with heathkit manuals th
/archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00465.html (10,955 bytes)

86. Re: [Amps] Heathkit SB220 manual (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:16:29 -0500
Well I think its a tad ridiculous to be upholding a copyright on a manual for a 40-50 year old piece of equipment! For crying out loud, I can go to any of the manufacturers and download a manual for
/archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00468.html (10,833 bytes)

87. Re: [Amps] You can't make this stuff up.... (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:50:12 -0500
Yep, saw that a few weeks ago shortly after it was posted, now that's funny! 73, Scott -- _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00031.html (7,806 bytes)

88. Re: [Amps] SB-1000 tuning question (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:43:02 -0500
5:1? Why even bother running an amp if your SWR is that high. That's a lot of reflected power back into the shack and on your feedline. I know a guy that runs an amp with a huge antenna mismatch and
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00209.html (10,858 bytes)

89. Re: [Amps] High SWR was SB-1000 tuning question (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:17:20 -0500
I run 100w if i have to, and sometimes even turn on the amp if i want even more, but most of the time i run less. The only exception is when band conditions are poor and i need a little extra kick in
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00211.html (10,468 bytes)

90. Re: [Amps] High SWR (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:04:41 -0500
Very good point, thanks for mentioning that I never thought about the voltage rating of the feedline at the higher SWR. Can specs be found for the various types of coax showing their max voltage? A c
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00221.html (9,297 bytes)

91. Re: [Amps] High SWR, (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:44:41 -0500
Stop the name calling Carl and just leave the people who want to have a meaningful conversation alone. I told you once and I will tell you again, I have both a Handbook and Antenna Book, but they are
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00232.html (10,276 bytes)

92. Re: [Amps] High SWR (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:45:35 -0500
Just found that table in the new version, took some searching to find it! 73, Scott -- _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00233.html (9,817 bytes)

93. Re: [Amps] High SWR, (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:47:53 -0500
Why doesn't someone finally kick Carl off here for god's sake? I can't remember the last time he contributing something on topic or worth reading. I was on a different computer today when his comment
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00234.html (11,315 bytes)

94. Re: [Amps] High SWR, (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:24:40 -0500
By now Carl is probably making posts that attack me in person, most likely attacking my intelligence or some other mental ability, that's where he always takes it. So have fun reading his replies as
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00248.html (14,887 bytes)

95. Re: [Amps] High SWR, (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:47:14 -0500
Thin skinned no, but tired of people like Carl who pretend to be better than everyone. 73, Scott -- _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00250.html (19,003 bytes)

96. Re: [Amps] High SWR, (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:53:21 -0500
""Whether I leave or not is immaterial and it certainly wont be at the request of someone like Scott. Particularly since my post was rather generic and not singling out anyone. Guilty conscience may
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00253.html (19,245 bytes)

97. Re: [Amps] High SWR, (score: 1)
Author: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:57:19 -0500
Hope to catch you on the radio some day here as well! 73, Scott -- _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/a
/archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00254.html (23,871 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 97
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu