Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+G2DAF\s+amplifier\s+information\s+\(KG2BU\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: ab2et@juno.com (ab2et@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:37:26 -0500
Jan, Your comments about Kris KG2BU (SP) are of no surprise to me, we in the New York region have know about him and his "Mighty Killer Amplifier" for some time and if you think that he is 50 kHz wid
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00906.html (17,079 bytes)

2. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: ab2et@juno.com (ab2et@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:37:26 -0500
Jan, Your comments about Kris KG2BU (SP) are of no surprise to me, we in the New York region have know about him and his "Mighty Killer Amplifier" for some time and if you think that he is 50 kHz wid
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00907.html (17,051 bytes)

3. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:04:27 -0700
One defense is to operate just below the top edge of the band. If the Mighty Killer Amplifier rears its ugly head, it splatters outside the amateur service band and the FCC can take legal measures.
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00909.html (8,166 bytes)

4. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: ab2et@juno.com (ab2et@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:41:27 -0500
Rich, Wishful thinking on your part the "Gent" in question sticks to the "center" of the band in question and starts his squawking back to Poland, the signal being so wide that I can carry on a conve
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00910.html (9,474 bytes)

5. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:02:10 -0700
Moderate alcohol consumption has been shown to increase life expectancy. the joke is on us, Steve - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfa
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00911.html (8,421 bytes)

6. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: ki7rw@arrl.net (Lee Roberts)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:10:38 -0700
I believe that there is an FCC rule that requires good engineering of the station - I don't have a copy of Part 97 with me. And, technically, KG2BU is still guilty of interference since he is probabl
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00912.html (10,377 bytes)

7. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: ab2et@juno.com (ab2et@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:17:22 -0500
Lee, Technical you are correct... but Ryely and Reality ? now that is a leap and a true test of faith. It looks like they must be on opposite orbital tracks. I do not know of any operator on the East
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00913.html (11,895 bytes)

8. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (KG2BU) (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:34:28 -0700
What a joke. What is good? Paragraph D says splatter must not go beyond the Amateur Service band. Probably not. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest
/archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00915.html (11,212 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu