Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+big\s+boy\s+toys\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+big\s+boy\s+toys\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 10 Mar 98 12:02:12 -0800; 30,000w amplifiers are legal for use in amateur service provided that they are not delivering more than 1500w plus 10% to the antenna. (1650w). A friend's station was fcc inspected. They measured 17; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00154.html (8,203 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 12:21:01 -0800; standpoint of self-policing and fair play, I would have to disagree. I figure I'll let the CB'ers (both with and without Amateur licenses) run their 10 KW rigs and I'll stick with my faithful pair of; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00155.html (7,907 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 98 02:17:08 -0800; What about the chap who lives at the bottom of a canyon, who has a 900ft run of RG213 to his antenna at the top of the canyon? The power that goes into the feedline is not what gets transmitted. My; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00166.html (8,554 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 98 02:17:10 -0800; It's the margin fcc inspectors apparently allow for error, Jon.. The fcc guys I have known are not unreasonable. Their main goal is to prevent interference, not to write people up for trivalities. c; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00167.html (7,887 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 12:19:59; Oh, I understand about feedline losses. In any case, the reg is transmitter output. I'd like to think the inspectors would cut us 10 percent slack. I'd like even more to think of them dropping in on; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00169.html (8,111 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:20:46 EST; Is there not something in the FCC regs about uV/cm as an alternative measurement? I have not read all the lawyer words in many years. 73 Carl KM1H ____________________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00180.html (9,318 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 02:10:56 GMT; On Wed, 11 Mar 98 02:17:10 -0800, Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> wrote: <snip> _______________________________________________________________ Times must have changed. I recall reading in old QSTs a; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00196.html (7,971 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Re: big boy toys (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 98 05:01:13 -0800; A ham friend used to be an fcc engineer. He told me that one CB amplifier was confiscated that the fcc could not test at it's warehouse / testing facility in Virginia. Some amplifiers operate from 2; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00230.html (8,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]