Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ALC\s+Overshoot\s+FTDX\-5000\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:45:58 -0700
I thought you would like to know what a friend of mine found on his new (less than 1 year old) FTDX-5000 for ALC overshoot... Setting the power out to 25.5 watts the overshoot reached 26.9 amounting
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00188.html (7,281 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:56:28 +0200
That is no ALC overshoot, but the breathing power supply 73 Peter, DJ7WW I thought you would like to know what a friend of mine found on his new (less than 1 year old) FTDX-5000 for ALC overshoot...
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00189.html (7,294 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:12:51 -0400
What is the time constant of the Powermaster? Then only clear way to measure the sub 5 ms spikes is with a scope. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list A
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00190.html (8,928 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:49:23 -0700
That's not real overshoot, that's just a percent or two, within standard reference errors. "Overshoot" is usually a significant percentage, like setting for 100W and having 150-200W spikes. I've had
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00191.html (9,033 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:55:57 -0700
I agree. Overshoot should have been in Quotes. "Overshoot". Because there is none. That's not real overshoot, that's just a percent or two, within standard reference errors. "Overshoot" is usually a
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00192.html (9,294 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:57:28 -0700
Not sure. But It measures a single dit at 60 WPM CW just fine. 73 Jim W7RY What is the time constant of the Powermaster? Then only clear way to measure the sub 5 ms spikes is with a scope. 73, ... Jo
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00193.html (10,008 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:45:21 -0400
Not probative - a single dit at 60 WPM is 24 msec. "PARIS" is 42 bit (dot) periods ... 1/42 => 24 ms. Now, if you tell me the Powermaster can measure a single dit at 600 WPM, I will accept it as a r
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00194.html (10,776 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:42:32 -0600
Not to nit pick but 60wpm is 20.0ms/dit. Letter spacing = 3 dits and word spacing = 7dits P = 11 + 3 A = 5 + 3 R = 7 + 3 I = 3 + 3 S = 5 + 7 Total = 50 dit times Therefore dit time = 1.2 / WPM 73, La
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00195.html (11,886 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 01:26:52 -0400
Yes, I missed the "I" when I did the quick calculation. I never remember the number when I need it <G>. In any case it doesn't change the fact that reading the correct power in a 20 or 24 ms period w
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00196.html (13,356 bytes)

10. [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 01:56:35 -0700
What is the time constant of the Powermaster? Then only clear way to measure the sub 5 ms spikes is with a scope. 73, ... Joe, W4TV and any of them will easily show the 3% ripple of any of my 4 x Dra
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00197.html (9,125 bytes)

11. [Amps] ALC Overshoot FTDX-5000 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:32:10 -0400
I suspect the Powermaster samples much like the LP-100A. N8LP informed me that 100% detectability occurs in 7-10 ms with his wattmeter. So, I think Joe is correct in that a scope is required for sho
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00205.html (8,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu